Correspondence

My Request for a Split Examination for George Elvin’s Oral Examination: A note stating the belief that an explanation as to why sitting separate from Professor Black for George Elvin’s oral exam was required due to outstanding issues between the two.

14/05/1996

Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy

References

Correspondence 4 Items

Note indicating that Christopher Alexander will not be present at the meeting and will examine George Elvin by himself and give results 08/05/1996

Academic, Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy
Notice of Admission to Qualifying Examination. Administrative Committee of the Graduate Council has appointed a Qualifying examination requiring all members to attend; Voting Procedure and Split Vote instructions attached 15/05/1996

Academic, Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy
Contains a packet of letters regarding the oral examination of George Elvin, including letters between faculty members, Chair and Dean, regarding the Qualifying Examination, Report to the Graduate Division on the Qualifying Examination for Admission to Doctoral Candidacy 09/08/1996

Academic, Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy
A) Factual Information Not Transmitted To You, with Commentaries B) My Recommendations. Detailed information on both subjects is provided after a show of gratitude for a letter and phone conversation. Recommendation for a failing grade on Oral Exams and recommendations for reprimands that should be administered 03/09/1996

Academic, Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy

SEE ALL Correspondence

Course Material 1 Items

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination: Construction Methods and Building Quality 01/05/1996

Academic, Student Work, Ph.D. Qualifying Examination

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Committee: Gary Black – Chair, Christopher Alexander, Hansjoachim Neis, C. William Ibbs, Cassandra Adams.