Correspondence

My Request for a Split Examination for George Elvin’s Oral Examination: A note stating the belief that an explanation as to why sitting separate from Professor Black for George Elvin’s oral exam was required due to outstanding issues between the two.

14/05/1996

Administrative, Ph.D. Advancement to Candidacy

Sender:

Christopher Alexander, University of California Berkeley, College of Environmental Design, Department of Architecture, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.

Recipient:

Nezar AlSayyad, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.

Medium:

Letter

Content of

Academic Course

Advisor in the Ph.D. Program in Architecture 1996

University Program:

Ph.D. in Architecture

Instructors:

Christopher Alexander

Enrolled students:

George Elvin

Advising students in the Ph.D. Program in Architecture and participating in the Ph.D. Qualifying Examination committee.

Academic Activity

Administrative Matters 1996

Administrative

Includes findings related to: Faculty meetings, retreats and appointments; Departmental teaching, studies, and admissions; Correspondence exchanged among the faculty members and between faculty and students.

References

Correspondence

SEE ALL Correspondence

Course Material

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination: Construction Methods and Building Quality 01/05/1996

Academic, Student Work, Ph.D. Qualifying Examination

Authors:

George Elvin, University of California Berkeley, College of Environmental Design, Department of Architecture, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.

Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Committee: Gary Black – Chair, Christopher Alexander, Hansjoachim Neis, C. William Ibbs, Cassandra Adams.